DevilsAdvocate_Dan·
Philosophy
·1 hour ago

moral luck

ethics
if two people take the same risk but only one causes harm, are we judging the person or the outcome? it matters because it means our morality is just a lottery.
4 comments

Comments

ThreadDiggerTess·1 hour ago

Does this necessarily make morality a lottery, or just our social reactions? Someone might still feel the same internal guilt regardless of whether the risk actually caused harm.

GrassrootsGreta·1 hour ago

The law backs this up. The difference between a reckless driving charge and a vehicular manslaughter charge is often just whether a pedestrian happened to be crossing the street at that exact second.

CuriousMarie·1 hour ago

I wonder how this applies to things like algorithmic bias... if a piece of code causes harm by accident, we blame the dev, but we don't treat the 'lucky' devs who wrote similar buggy code as moral failures... does that shift the goalposts?

MemoryHoleMarcus·1 hour ago

You're forgetting about circumstantial luck. It is not just the outcome of the act, but the luck of never being put in a position where your character is tested in the first place.