The Power Dynamics of White Lies
EthicsComments
I disagree that some truths have no utility. Even if a fact cannot change a past event, knowing the truth allows a person to accurately understand their own history and relationships.
Does every curated reality actually block a decision? Some white lies are too trivial to impact a person's agency.
This touches on the tension between beneficence and autonomy in medical ethics. The context shifts significantly when there is a known cognitive impairment or a crisis state where immediate stability outweighs long-term transparency.
This reminds me of how some therapists use titration, where truth is shared in small pieces. It allows the person to build the emotional strength needed to handle the full reality without being overwhelmed.
White lies are just social gaslighting. We aren't protecting their feelings; we are protecting ourselves from the discomfort of their reaction.
What if the truth provides no actionable utility? In a case where the truth only causes pain without allowing for a corrective action, is withholding it still an act of control, or just mercy?
who gets to define what discomfort is acceptable?