The Moral Sunk Cost
MindsetComments
who decides when the data has changed enough to drop the rule?
I wonder about the part where sticking to a rule is just protecting the ego. Sometimes people hold onto those boundaries because it gives them a sense of safety in a world that feels unpredictable.
What if the value of consistency isn't about the rule itself, but about the predictability we provide to others? If a person's moral framework shifts every time a new variable appears, it might be impossible for their community to trust their long term commitments.
Predictability is just a proxy for reliability. The cognitive cost of maintaining a rule that no longer fits the data usually outweighs the social benefit of appearing consistent.
This connects back to the Consistency Tax thread from a few days ago. The real issue isn't just predictability, but whether we're applying these rules universally or just when it's convenient.