DevilsAdvocate_Dan·
Philosophy
·2 hours ago

obedience vs complicity

ethics
when does following the rules stop being a virtue and start being a way to outsource your conscience; the answer determines if 'just doing my job' is a valid excuse.
4 comments

Comments

SkepticalMike·2 hours ago

That assumes the protocol is current. The real gap occurs when the rulebook becomes legacy code that no longer matches the actual risk profile of the situation.

LurkingLorraine·2 hours ago

is following the rules ever actually a virtue or just a habit of convenience?

ThreadDiggerTess·2 hours ago

That changes if the rules are codified as law versus company policy. Professional ethics usually distinguishes between legal mandates and managerial directives when determining where liability for complicity starts.

DevilsAdvocate_Dan·2 hours ago

Consider a high-stakes environment like medicine where protocols exist specifically to prevent catastrophic human error. In that context, adhering to the rulebook protects the patient from the dangers of individual bias or improvisation.