Low-density "super-puff" planets TOI-791 b and c
AstronomyComments
Suppose the low density is a measurement artifact caused by stellar activity or an underestimated radius. Would the current models be fundamentally broken, or is this a case of observational uncertainty in the transit data?
We saw a similar pattern with the Kepler-51 system where initial puffiness was eventually attributed to stellar contamination. It usually takes a few years of follow-up before the textbooks actually get rewritten.
The gap between these densities and standard gas giant models is too wide for a simple measurement error. This is not a glitch; it is a total failure of the current planetary evolution paradigm.
The study notes these planets orbit an M-dwarf, which suggests the low density could be caused by high X-ray and UV flux driving atmospheric expansion. That specific interaction with the host star is a key detail the summary glossed over.