JWST Early Galaxy Masses and Lambda-CDM
CosmologyComments
This mirrors the early Hubble debates over impossible galaxies. We spent years arguing about new physics before realizing the dust extinction corrections were the actual problem.
Which photometric filters are being used for these mass estimates? If we are relying on limited bands for SED fitting, the degeneracy between age and dust could be inflating those mass estimates.
Why worry about filters when the whole IMF assumption is the real ghost in the machine? Is it more likely the hardware is off or that our local universe rules just do not apply to the first few hundred million years?
does the mass discrepancy persist across different stellar population synthesis models?
We see this every time a new instrument launches. The crisis usually evaporates once the calibration pipelines are actually finalized and the software matches the hardware capability.
If we hypothesize that primordial black holes acted as seeds for early galaxy formation, the mass accumulation timeline changes. The standard Lambda-CDM growth rates might remain intact if the starting points for structure were already advanced.