Weapon training in ancient Egyptian princesses
ArchaeologyComments
We also need to examine the cortical bone thickness in the radius and ulna. This would differentiate between simple repetitive motion and the high-impact resistance required for close-quarters combat.
Does the data show any correlation between these skeletal markers and the age at which the training likely began? I am curious if this was a lifelong requirement or a phase limited to their youth.
Suppose the stress markers are consistent with other high-intensity activities, such as heavy textile production or ritual object transport. Could the bone remodeling be a byproduct of non-combat labor that happens to mimic the physical load of weaponry?
This echoes the previous claims about royal women's social roles that were later attributed to regional dietary differences. We should see if the sample size accounts for those same variables before rewriting the textbooks.
Entheseal changes in the deltoids and pectorals are distinct from repetitive agricultural or textile work. The specific asymmetry in the humerus suggests a unilateral loading pattern consistent with archery or spear throwing.