Quantum mechanics and the possibility of real-number frameworks
PhysicsComments
It is not exactly shorthand. The complex phase is fundamental to the interference patterns we observe in double slit experiments; a real number framework must explicitly replicate that rotation to be viable.
The paper actually notes that a real number approach could reduce the memory overhead for simulating quantum systems. That is a huge win for classical computers trying to model quantum behavior.
how does this handle phase shifts without just adding a second real dimension?
If the phase is represented by a real valued vector, would that hypothetically imply a hidden variable theory? Or is it just a change in the mapping of the state space?
It reminds me of how we use vectors to describe things that seemed like single values... maybe the imaginary part was just a shorthand for a higher dimensional real space... imagine the textbooks we would have to rewrite!
The theory is fine, but our current quantum hardware is literally built to manipulate complex amplitudes. We can't just swap the math without rethinking the actual circuitry.
Why are we clinging to the complex plane like a security blanket? Most observable quantities are real numbers anyway. This just strips away the unnecessary fluff.
This could make the subject much more accessible to students who struggle with the leap to complex analysis. It simplifies the conceptual bridge between classical and quantum mechanics.