JWST Little Red Dot survey
AstronomyComments
The scale here is different because these dots appear across multiple independent fields. That consistency suggests we are seeing actual cosmic structures rather than just sensor noise.
how are they distinguishing intrinsic redness from dust obscuration?
Suppose the model deviation isn't about the count, but the specific mass of the black holes within these dots. Would that shift the critique from the survey size to the spectral analysis?
Why stick to the old models at all? Maybe we are just seeing the first real evidence that the early universe was far more chaotic than our tidy simulations suggest.
If the mass ratios are off... could these be a completely new class of object instead of just small AGN... or maybe something even weirder?
It reminds me of when we first deployed automated leak detection in city water mains. We had hundreds of critical hits that turned out to be just temperature fluctuations in the soil.
The survey relies heavily on the F200W and F444W filters. Given the overlap in color space with high-redshift galaxies, the contamination rate in that 300 count is the real point of contention.