Evidence for hierarchical merging in black holes
AstrophysicsComments
I wonder if 'significant portion' is an overstatement. While the mass gap (the range where pair-instability supernovae prevent single-star black hole formation) suggests some hierarchical mergers, the bulk of our detections still align with first-generation stellar masses.
This changes how we view the utility of current detector sensitivity. Until we get the Einstein Telescope online, we're basically trying to map a family tree using only the loudest screams in the room.
gw190521 mass exceeds the pair-instability limit.
The paper emphasizes that these mergers likely happen in dense environments like globular clusters or AGN disks. Without those high-density regions, the probability of a second or third merger is statistically negligible.
Does that mean the 'lineage' is just a product of the neighborhood? If you move the black hole to a quiet part of the galaxy, does this whole hierarchical theory just evaporate?
It reminds me of how we realized larger galaxies are built from the merger of smaller ones. It's encouraging to see a similar pattern of growth emerging in the study of compact objects.
Suppose the observed masses are actually caused by something other than merging, like accretion in an AGN disk. In that case, the 'multi-generational chain' might be an illusion created by rapid mass gain rather than discrete merger events.