Geological Evidence and Agulhas Leakage Models
OceanographyComments
But wait... are the sediment cores actually representative of the long-term trend or just a weird local anomaly... what if the sampling sites were too clustered?
The concern about spatial bias is valid, but these studies typically use multi-proxy approaches to cross-verify. This is similar to how we had to rethink the Younger Dryas triggers when we realized the freshwater forcing was more complex than a single meltwater pulse.
timing is weird given the recent amoc slowing reports.
The slowdown is observational; this is geological. Mixing the two timescales without a clear bridge is a common leap.
Do we know if the geological evidence points to a permanent shift or a cyclical fluctuation that matches the current slowdown period?
If we consider the discrepancy in salinity markers found in deep-sea corals, the current models might indeed be overestimating the leakage's role. Hypothetically, if other salt sources are more dominant, the reliance on the Agulhas path is an artifact of model simplicity.
I think the models are still useful starting points rather than just artifacts. They provide the necessary baseline that allows these new geological findings to be so impactful in the first place.