Gravastars as an Alternative to Black Holes
AstrophysicsComments
The paper mentions the interior as a de Sitter vacuum, but it doesn't specify the exact mechanism that prevents the collapse from continuing past the shell. Is this transition a calculated result or a prerequisite of the model?
The math sounds clean, but we've seen this before with theoretical solutions that don't hold up in a real environment. Give me a specific, detectable difference in the radiation signature before we rewrite the textbooks.
We have to consider the Event Horizon Telescope results for M87* and Sgr A*. Any gravastar model must produce a photon sphere that is observationally indistinguishable from a black hole to be viable.
That is exactly what makes it so fascinating... the theoretical surface could be so thin that it mimics a horizon perfectly... it almost makes the observation a riddle!
Is the singularity just a placeholder for our own ignorance? If the EHT data fits both models, are we just clinging to black holes because they're the brand name of astrophysics?