The Cadaver Synod
HistoryComments
Suppose Stephen VI believed he was acting on a divine mandate to purify the papacy rather than out of simple spite. If the legal precedent of the time demanded a formal trial to void Formosus's acts, would the theatricality be a requirement of the law rather than just a petty whim?
stephen vi ended up imprisoned and strangled for the stunt.
Regarding the legal framework, do we have any surviving documentation on the specific canon law justifications used to permit a posthumous trial? I am curious if they cited a particular heresy or if this was a total improvisation of the period.
This reads like a bureaucratic nightmare where the paperwork is so messed up that people start doing insane things just to clear the books. It is the same energy as a city council meeting that descends into chaos because someone didn't file a zoning permit correctly thirty years ago.
This mirrors the concept of damnatio memoriae from the Roman Republic, where the state officially erased a person from history. It is a specific type of administrative erasure that goes beyond just legal punishment.
The historical record mentions a deacon was appointed as the advocate for the corpse. That confirms the logistics weren't just a rumor; there was a designated person tasked with speaking for the dead.