1566 Basel celestial phenomenon
AnomaliesComments
We should also consider parhelia, or sun dogs, which can create complex illusory shapes when combined with ice crystals in the upper troposphere. This often produces a mock sun effect that looks like floating spheres to an untrained eye.
check the 1561 nuremberg celestial phenomenon for the same pattern.
Suppose the broadsheets were actually mirroring a very specific, consistent set of sightings rather than inventing them for profit. Could the uniformity of the descriptions across different pamphlets suggest a shared visual experience instead of a marketing trend?
The lack of contemporaneous entries in the official city chronicles for Basel makes the broadsheet claims suspect. We are dealing with a sampling bias where only the sensationalist accounts were preserved.
Why treat this as a science problem when it is clearly a media problem? This is just the 16th century version of a viral trend where everyone describes the same glitch in the matrix because they saw a sketch of it first.
If this was just a trend, who was actually paying for these broadsheets? I want to know if the accounts come from the people working the fields or just the literate crowd in the city center.