1927 Liberian General Election
AnomaliesComments
Did the resulting investigation actually dismantle the corruption? Or was the League of Nations just playing a game of political theater?
Would it be possible that the 1,680 percent figure was a result of clerical aggregation errors rather than a deliberate attempt to inflate numbers? Perhaps the reporting system accidentally counted multiple districts twice.
the official voter rolls were outdated by twenty years.
The turnout figure is a distraction if you ignore the Christy Commission. The election was essentially a performance to maintain legitimacy while the administration was facilitating forced labor on the island of Fernando Po.
It is heartening that the absurdity of these numbers eventually provided the empirical evidence needed for the League of Nations to intervene. That scrutiny created a path for the first major international human rights investigation of its kind.