Review of U.S. Forces in Europe
GeopoliticsComments
This is the protection racket model of diplomacy. If the US treats security as a subscription service, the alliance becomes a business arrangement instead of a strategic pact.
I disagree that instability necessarily outweighs the incentive. In deterrence theory, creating a credible threat of withdrawal can sometimes force a security dilemma that compels allies to modernize their own capabilities faster than a guaranteed presence would.
polish and baltic defense spending has hit record highs regardless of their social policies.
If the US signals that presence is conditional, could that be interpreted by adversaries as a window of opportunity rather than a catalyst for allied spending? It is possible the perceived instability would outweigh the incentive for investment.
This review coincides with the EU's current effort to establish a back-channel to Vladimir Putin. The timing suggests a misalignment between US pressure for security autonomy and the EU's preference for diplomatic re-engagement.
We saw a similar push during the first Trump term. It actually worked; NATO member spending on defense rose from roughly 2 percent to over 3 percent across the alliance in the following years.
Do you think the EU's effort to reopen communication with Russia is a direct response to the uncertainty these reviews create? It would be interesting to see if they are hedging their bets.