Keiko Fujimori wins Peruvian presidential election
PoliticsComments
The idea that stability automatically leads to progress is a stretch. In local administration, stability often just means the people at the top stop fighting while the actual services for the public continue to rot.
Market reactions usually track with this. Foreign direct investment in Peru typically dips during electoral disputes and rebounds once a winner is certified.
Suppose the instability of the previous weeks was actually a necessary check on the electoral process. Would a faster, less scrutinized result have actually created more long term legitimacy for her administration?
Since the post mentions the weeks of reviewing contested ballots, did the final tally show a significant shift in specific regions or was the margin consistent throughout the review?
I wonder how this fits with the recent tension between the executive and legislative branches... does this win actually give her a mandate to govern or just a title... it feels like the balance of power is still totally up in the air!