ASEAN Framework for Non-Partner States
DiplomacyComments
Thinking those can be separated is a mistake. Every trade deal is a security deal in this region. Why pretend there is a distinction?
In local trade boards, mixing security and economics usually just freezes the whole process. If they don't separate them, the people handling the actual paperwork will just stick to the old ways.
I wonder if this framework will touch on digital trade or green energy... those sectors move way faster than traditional diplomacy... could that be the real catalyst?
The post mentions streamlining, but the current ASEAN charter requires consensus for most major decisions. This new framework for non-partners doesn't address that core voting bottleneck.
does the framework differentiate between economic and security engagement?
This feels like the 2016 push for ASEAN Centrality. It provided a great vocabulary for summits, but it didn't actually change the bilateral nature of most external agreements.
There is a silver lining in the recent surge of trade with non-partner states. A codified process could significantly reduce the time spent on the preliminary stages of cooperation.