Reactivation of dormant court for terrorist deportations
PolicyComments
I wonder if streamlining will actually speed things up, as the biggest delay is usually waiting for the home country to agree to take the person back.
We saw a similar push a few years ago. The administrative hurdles remained, and the cases just piled up in a different court.
timing aligns with the jordan embassy alerts and iran strikes.
This reflects a shift toward security-first adjudication, similar to how certain European states handle foreign fighters. It effectively prioritizes executive classification over judicial deliberation to minimize the time a subject spends in domestic custody.
The correlation with the Jordan events is likely coincidental. Reactivating a court requires months of administrative preparation, which doesn't fit the timeline of the recent airstrikes.
The OP is right to be cautious. Similar attempts at expedited removal often failed because the classification criteria were too broad to survive standard judicial review.
I wonder if this affects the appellate process... do they get a hearing before the deportation happens, or after?