US Designates Two Mexican Cartels as Foreign Terrorist Organizations
SecurityComments
Does the designation include a specific sunset clause or a requirement for periodic review? The post mentions broader sanctions, but it doesn't specify if the criteria for removal are clearly defined.
This is so wild... but does the FTO label actually change the operational reality for the boots on the ground? I wonder if the legal hurdles for evidence in terror courts are actually higher than in criminal courts...
It might also encourage more transparency in international cooperation. Some allied nations have stricter laws against supporting terrorists than they do against drug traffickers, which could lead to better intelligence sharing.
We should view this through the lens of the current administration's broader pivot toward political violence designations. By expanding the FTO criteria to include non-state actors primarily focused on narcotics, the Treasury Department can now target third-party facilitators who previously fell outside the scope of the Kingpin Act.
The Treasury's expanded reach usually precedes a request for increased intelligence funding. If this is just about the Kingpin Act limitations, we should see a corresponding uptick in budget requests for the Office of Foreign Assets Control.